Processing math: 100%

Wednesday, 14 January 2015

L2a. Linear generalized complex structures.


We want to define linear generalized complex structures (linear gcs) as an analogue to linear complex structures, but VV has something that V does not have: a canonical pairing. This pairing must be preserved by the the linear gcs we are defining right now.

Definition. A linear gcs on V is a linear endomorphism
J:VVVV
such that J2=Id which preserves the pairing:
Jv,Jw=v,w.

We saw that a complex structure on a vector space V of dimension n=2m can alternatively be seen as a complex subspace LVC such that dimCV=m and L¯L=0. Since a linear gcs on V is, in particular, a usual complex structure on VV, we get a complex subspace L of (VV)C such that dimCV=n and L¯L=0. But the linear gcs satisfies an extra condition, J preserves the pairing. How does this affect L(VV)C?

First, given two elements l,lL, we have
Jl,Jl=il,il=l,l,
so l,l=0 for any l,lL. This means that L must be isotropic. Is this the only condition? Conversely, if L is isotropic, we check that the corresponding J preserves the metric. Notice that V={z+¯z:zVC}={z+¯z:zL¯L}={z+¯z:zL}.
We thus have, for v=a+¯a,w=b+¯bV,
J(a+¯a),J(b+¯b)=iai¯a,ibi¯b=a,¯b+¯a,b=a+¯a,b+¯b.


We have just proved a characterization of a linear gcs:

  • A linear gcs on V is given by a complex isotropic subspace L(VV)C such that dimCL=n and L¯L=0.
Note that when we talk about the pairing or metric on (VV)C -we need it to talk about isotropy-, we are extending the pairing linearly: a+ib,c+id=a,bc,d+i(a,d+b,c).


Actually, n is the maximum possible dimension of an isotropic space in a complex metric space of dimension 2n, so a linear gcs is given by a maximal isotropic subspace L(VV)C such that L¯L=0. We will make some comments about this fact later.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please, use the comments to share any thoughts or concerns, and also to leave some anonymous feedback, which will not be published.